This Open Letter is the 19th in the series interlocking the pieces of the jigsaw together. The picture forming is of one of government-led corruption for which see link as to the reason why and who is to be protected: http://www.criticalreader2006.blogspot.com/
"I'm armed with more than complete steel -
The justice of my quarrel". Christopher Marlowe.
Open Letter to Mr Richard Mason, Chief Finance Officer for Lancaster City Council.
The Town Hall, Dalton Square Lancaster to be sent by email.
From my home address in Lancaster.
Dear Mr Mason
I have again my counicl tax under duress because of the harassment offered to me by your staff when I tried to claim council tax relief.
You ignored my email of over one month ago because I am struggling to understand the bankruptcy which you, and others, seem to know the details of but which does not comply with the law. (Link http://insolvencyservicecorruptionwatchuk.blogspot.com/ ) I asked you, as I have asked others, who the Creditors were.
Nobody will tell me.
Apparently I bankrupted myself on 24 March 2006. History was rewritten when it was clear I knew the law. The letter you gave me a copy of from an Insolvency Practitioner asking you if I owed you monies was to cover for the fact that the entry in the London Gazette had been
12 July 06 after mail had been intercepted and the contents read. The entry was suposed to have been 5 July 06 but I had been printing off pages from the London Gazette since 29 June 06 and nothing appeared until 14 July 06. The intercepted letter told the intended recipient that nothing was in the Gazette therefore it wasn't legal. I knew the law.
The letter to you was to try and account for that corruption.
You tried to account for that letter from an Insolvency Practitioner touting for business by telling me they routinely did that.
I wondered why no other IP had bothered if it was standard practice as you told me it was.
I also noted the (small print) connections with a recruited thug and unintelligent bully in the wider issue.
Rubbish, Mr Mason, you insult my intelligence.
You said that you would take recovery action if I didn't pay my council tax. I asked how you would take recovery action against a bankrupt.
You said that as I owed nothing at the time the IP was touting for business that you were not a creditor. You could never have been a creditor because of your recovery procedures and the law.
The Council Tax and Enforcement Regulations 1992 would not have ever let anyone become a debtor to you so you could never have become a creditor. The rules are clear, the 14 days grace allowed for payment of council taxes due before recovery action in the magistrates court w ensure that you could not ever be considered as a creditor. Quite simply no one could ever have been a debtor to you because being such would have ensured their appearance in the magistrates court.
Mr Mason, your emails gave me some good information for which I thank you.
The recovery action for non-payment of council tax was significant.
The law is clear, non payment of council tax is a criminal offence.
That offence became statute law to prevent persons declaring themselves bankrupt to avoid paying council tax. And IP's do not become involved without appointment in those circumstances, or without appointment at all by either the debtor or the Secretary of State. They are greedy and want paying for all they do. The ones writing to you in the revision hsitory attempt would not be paid by anyone. IP's do not work like that.
Mr Mason, I think that was what you were informing me of to assist me.
The non-payment of council tax has to be a criminal offence because a Local Authority has no corporate personality and cannot bankrupt anybody.
Further, if a government dept. is involved in a bankruptcy the matters must automatically be remitted to the High Court.
I told the ignorant, inexperinced "judge" in June 2006 of that and that I was there to present my counterclaim of fraud.
That also meant that she was obliged to remit the case to the High Court also.
As a deputy district judge she had not the jurisdiction to hear the case and also with so much money involved that was another factor which she in her ignorance of the law refused to take notice of. Naturally the educated idiot from LCC, Hoffman, would not inform her that I was right because he was also as ignorant as she was.
The private meeting they had had beforehand included Stephen Sainsbury criminal on the loose a.k.a. Lancaster County Court Manager. It did not include me.
The ultra Vires is proven. Automatic miscarriage of justice.
I told Jim Underwood he wasn't good enough to work for you, he's a liar and corrupt, the Chairman last October saw that.
But, Mr Mason, I'm sorry to say that you're not perfect because you hung on to the cheque awarded to me after that tribunal. I won that case and it was a land mark ruling despite the corruption from LCC legal department with Welfare Rights on White Cross in Lancaster forging my signature to obtain my file from the Appeals Service and stealing my original submissions. Ian Young from LCC legal dept. in County Hall forged my signature and Welfare Rights conspired in that. Welfare Rights were never going to represent me. I had never asked them knowing that they were corrupt to cover for the most corrupt Local Authority in England.
You told me that you were considering an appeal against my winning that tribunal but I don't think you were. You couldn't have afforded to lose again. You were being instructed to hang on to the cheque so that I could be deprived of the monies via a frozen bank account which at the time couldn't be frozen because it was known that I knew the fraud.
It was not possible to hang on any longer than the month and you had to give the cheque to me and I presented it in the normal way without any problems.
I understand that the Official Receiver partner in crime is 'well known' to the person in the building society who constantly changed the status of my account to suit their corruption and cover their tracks.
To amuse you can I say that I received an email in March this year from the Official Receiver's partner in crime saying that he had then just discovered my account.
Liars that they were, they just expected me to be as stupid as they are and as bullied into submission as many others will have been before me.
But it is all on the Internet, their theft of my sickness benefits from me for an ulterior motive which will be explained in the unexpurgated version of this 'story', my book.
This kind of fraud and extortion is public interest.
But I do thank you, Mr Mason, the clues were there, I just needed to interview other people bankrupted legally.
I will continue to pay my council tax even though I am entitled to full benefits.
The discrimination is proven.
The harassment of me when I did try to claim what I was entitled to claim will become known as will the related harssment from those in Lancaster Job Plus with Preston and LCC again organising the criminals and there were many willing participants.
The entry for the DWP/JCP will be separate but linked to this.
Thank you for your time,
Yours sincerely Carol Woods
